21/04/2005
Drinking to the election of the Pope
I got drunk tonight. I don’t mean the ‘Wahay, you’re all my mates’ drunk, I mean the ‘You bastards, go on, I’ll take you all on’ drunk. Really, steaming, pissed-beyond-my-eyeballs drunk. And why?
Because the College of Cardinals has elected Cardinal-bloody-Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI, as if he shared anything with St Benedict or Benedict XV of blessed memory. Here’s the Catholic Church, spiritual mentor on one sixth of the population of the world, faced with a choice between a liberal South American, a sort of conservative Nigerian, and a downright doctrinal – well, there must be a better word than Nazi, but I’m damned if I know what it is – and we (they) have chosen the doctrinal bigot, the secretary of state of the Vatican, the chief proponent of death-through-lack-of-condoms, the hatemeister in chief, Cardinal-bloody-Ratzinger.
There were three votes. Out goes the Nigerian (Nostradamus predicts that a black Pope predicts the coming Apocalypse); out goes the Latin American (too populist, too in favour of the rights of the people, too concerned with devolving power to the bishops) and in comes, well, the worst of all worlds. In comes Benedict XVI, the most conservative Cardinal in the Vatican Council, centre of power in the later years of the late lamented Paulus II Johannes, the most conservative, marginalizing and divisive member of the entire College of Cardinals.
What were they thinking of? Not the vast numbers of gay Catholics (100 million of them); not the AIDS sufferers (20 million in Nigeria alone); not the sick, the ill, the poor; and certainly not the liberals. What on earth did they think they were doing? In the five minutes following the announcement of Benedict XVI’s appointment, I received 21 text messages from Catholic friends across the world. What are we going to do? Convert to Islam? Buy a house in Avignon and set up a rival Papacy? Renounce our vows and become part of the regular world? What do we do when our Pope simply does not represent us, does not form part of our world?
For those of us for whom being Catholic is the same as being human, is as natural to us as breathing, what can we do? To rebel against the Pope is as alien to us as to rebel against our lungs, to fight against the beating of our
heart, but how on earth can we have, can we tolerate, a pope like Cardinal Ratzinger? The Pope is created by the action of the Holy Spirit working through the Cardinal Electors, and therefore we cannot question his appointment. Well, yes, but… How are we meant to take this man as the direct line descendant of St. Peter? Is it, perhaps, possible, that just this once the Holy Spirit missed?
The man who can now issue papal bulls, the man who is infallible, who is the head of the Holy Mother Church, is a vicious right winger who has consistently acted according to a doctrine that simply no longer reflects the reality of the world, and which causes enormous pain and suffering to the disadvantaged, the lonely, the sick and the different – all those whom, in fact, Christ loved and loves. What is he doing at the head of the only true church? And what are we, who are members of Christ’s only church, formed in Christ’s image and in remembrance of Him, going to do about it?
I’ve got to take some aspirin…
Yours etc,
Spinoff.
11:26 Posted in The Pope | Permalink | Comments (7) | Email this


Comments
He might soften up a bit though. Now he's got the top job, mightn't it knock off some of his more unpleasant, careerist edges?
Posted by: mr salad | 21/04/2005
Can't help but agree with this. Radical in youth, seriously conservative when old. Only hope is that he's 78...
Posted by: Eczma Q Hippodrome | 21/04/2005
Liberal catholic? Isn't that a bit like a Jewish nazi?
Seriously, I was watching some American woman from a leftish catholic organisation on the tele yesterday. She was banging on about how this pope won't reflect her opinions on abortion (she's pro, he's a bit con, apparently), contraception (again, she liketh, he detesteth), gay marriage (etc etc), and I was left thinking: what core catholic belief do you actually go for, American lady?
I'm sure she's a cuddly and nice person, but I don't think she's really a proper RC. Surely you have to sign up to some of the doctrinal stuff or, er, join the Episcopalians or something?
It's like the Anglican bishop who thought that the ressurection is not a vital part of the christian faith. What next? Muslims who think Mohammed, on balance, probably wasn't the prophet? Hassidim noshing bacon sarnies? Zoroastrians who've never watched the original Mask of Zorro (1920)?
Fuck Apirins, I need a drink.
Posted by: Sleepwalker | 21/04/2005
well i chose him so you can all shut up. if he doesnt do what i want then im going to snuff him out anyway. HAH!
Posted by: god | 21/04/2005
You do get liberal Catholics, but just not at the top of the Church hierarchy. And no it's not like saying "you can get Jewish Nazis". The Catholics don't go about killing liberals.
Well, not any more anyway.
Posted by: spelunca | 21/04/2005
The Rat is screwed, if you ask me. I reckon he'll be a wopper of a failure. Yes JP2 was cut from the same cloth, but he had charisma.
Ratzinger has the charisma of a very depressed sloth.
Posted by: Kurt Godel | 21/04/2005
I'm not denying that there are people who describe themselves as 'liberal catholics'. It's just that if their beliefs on abortion, euthenasia, contraception etc diverge too far from Rome then, in my opinion, they are no longer really catholic.
If you bark, wag your tail and try to shag my leg, it doesn't matter how often you insist that you're a cat. I'll still call you a dog.
Posted by: Sleepwalker | 21/04/2005
The comments are closed.